ARTIFICE DAILY AI + CYBER SECURITY BRIEFING

Artificial Intelligence

Open models caught up faster in each era

SemiAnalysis compared open and closed frontier models across three LLM eras and said the time for open systems to close the first closed-model lead roughly halved each time.

SemiAnalysis

SemiAnalysis said it compared open and closed models across three eras of LLM development: early scaling, reasoning and agentic work. It said the scores came from curated benchmark sets, with most results produced by its own evaluation setup.

In the early scaling era, it said Llama-2-70B was the first open model to move near the frontier, although it still trailed the leading closed model. It said later open releases closed that gap to the then-leading closed systems.

For the reasoning era, it said o1-preview reset which benchmarks mattered and that DeepSeek R1 reduced the opening gap. It said R1-0528 closed that gap in May 2025.

In the agentic era, it said terminal and browser tasks had become the relevant tests for long-horizon work. It said Kimi K2.6 and GLM-5.2 overtook Opus 4.5 and GPT-5.2 within months, and it warned that benchmarks did not capture every part of real work.

Named in this story

People

Noam Brown
was cited as a hire that pointed OpenAI towards reasoning
Florian Brand
helped select benchmarks and check the evals

Companies

Anthropic
was one of the frontier labs compared in the analysis
OpenAI
was one of the closed-model labs compared in the analysis
DeepSeek
released the open models R1, V3 and R1-0528

Organisations

SemiAnalysis
published the analysis and the benchmark comparison

Products and systems

Llama-2-70B
was the first open model to approach the frontier in early scaling
GPT-3.5 Turbo
was the closed baseline in the early-scaling comparison
GPT-4o
was the last frontier model matched in the early-scaling era
DeepSeek V3
matched GPT-4o in December 2024
o1-preview
opened the reasoning era
DeepSeek R1
narrowed the initial reasoning-era gap
R1-0528
closed the reasoning-era gap in May 2025
Opus 4.5
served as the agentic-era frontier comparator
GPT-5.2
was OpenAI's agentic-era flagship in the comparison
Kimi K2.6
surpassed Opus 4.5 in the agentic era
GLM-5.2
cleared GPT-5.2 in the agentic era

How the source tells it

The register was analytical but promotional, with era-setting language, market talk and repeated self-marketing alongside the benchmark claims.

  • hype and novelty era language, breakthrough framing and celebratory adjectives used to make each model wave feel historic
  • threat inflation competition was recast as a margin threat through FUD language and disastrous worst-case claims
  • vendor boosterism the piece promoted its own numbers and products while contrasting them favourably with others