Artificial Intelligence
Hacktron Uses Claude to Take Over OpenAI Accounts
Three Hacktron researchers linked a Discourse image flaw and an OpenAI login weakness to reach staff accounts, then reported the bugs, showed limited access and stopped.
- Hacktron said three researchers used Anthropic's Claude Opus 5 to combine a Discourse bug with an OpenAI login weakness and access ChatGPT and Codex accounts belonging to several OpenAI employees.
- Hacktron said the same chain also reached an internal OpenAI code repository, and the team stopped after showing the access with one harmless pull request.
- According to Hacktron, OpenAI fixed the issue about 14 hours after the report and paid the team $6,500 on 1 September.
- Discourse marked the image issue as CVE-2026-32882 and rated it 8.8, but libheif's own advisory and national databases described it as an out-of-bounds read that could crash the software or leak memory.
- Hacktron said Claude Opus 4.8 had struggled first, then Claude Opus 5 produced a working exploit within hours, while the broader HEIF Heist claims were not independently confirmed.
Hacktron said three researchers combined a flaw in the software behind OpenAI's public help forum with a weakness in OpenAI's sign-in system to reach ChatGPT and Codex accounts used by several OpenAI employees. The team said it also reached an internal OpenAI code repository, but that the work was a controlled test and stopped after a single harmless pull request.
According to Hacktron, OpenAI fixed the issue about 14 hours after the report and later paid $6,500 on 1 September. OpenAI said the award recognised the OpenAI-side finding rather than the issue in Discourse, and it had not publicly described the login weakness.
The route in started with uploaded HEIC and HEIF images, which Discourse passed through ImageMagick to libheif. Discourse described the bug as remote code execution and assigned CVE-2026-32882 an 8.8 score, but libheif's advisory and vulnerability databases treated it as an out-of-bounds read that could crash software or expose memory.
Hacktron said leaked memory helped bypass ASLR and turn the crash into working code execution on the forum server. It said Claude Opus 4.8 struggled over several sessions, while Claude Opus 5 produced a working exploit within hours in a fresh session, after the researchers pointed it at their own test server and let it run in a loop.
The article said the same access could in theory have reached connected services such as GitHub, Slack and email, though that route was not used. It also said the wider HEIF Heist claims across other companies were only partly confirmed, with some reported flaws verified and others still unproven.
Named in this story
Companies
- Hacktron
- security firm whose researchers chained the flaws
- Anthropic
- company that released Claude Opus 5 and Claude Opus 4.8
- OpenAI
- whose staff accounts were accessed and who paid the bounty
Products and systems
- Claude Opus 5
- model Hacktron used to produce the exploit
- Claude Opus 4.8
- earlier model that struggled to build the exploit
- ChatGPT
- OpenAI service whose staff accounts were taken over
- Codex
- OpenAI service whose staff accounts were taken over
- Discourse
- forum software used for OpenAI's public help forum
- ImageMagick
- image-processing tool that passed files to libheif
- libheif
- library with the image-decoding flaw and later fix
- Debian 12
- distribution whose packaged libheif was still outdated
How the source tells it
Mostly technical and advisory, with little overt emotive framing.
No emotive framing was found in the original.