Artificial Intelligence
Anthropic launches Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic launched Claude Opus 5.5, saying the model matched Claude Fable 5.1 on most tasks, cut running costs, improved writing and added new safety and anti-distillation measures.
- Anthropic launched Claude Opus 5.5 as the first model in a new family.
- The company said it matched Claude Fable 5.1 on most tasks and cost about 40 per cent less to run than Opus 5.
- Anthropic set prices at $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens, and said cache read costs had fallen by 60 per cent.
- Artificial Analysis said Opus 5.5 scored 58 on its Intelligence Index and led six of ten evaluations.
Anthropic launched Claude Opus 5.5 and described it as the first model in a new family. It said Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Haiku 5.5 would follow in the coming weeks.
The company said Opus 5.5 matched Claude Fable 5.1 on most tasks while costing about 40 per cent less to run than Opus 5. Anthropic set the price at $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens, down from $5 and $25.
Anthropic said cache read costs were down 60 per cent and that total operating costs should be about 40 per cent lower than before. It also said output was more than 30 per cent faster and that subscriber usage limits would rise.
The company said the model wrote more naturally, used less jargon and followed instructions more closely. It also said the model added safeguards for cybersecurity, biology and frontier LLM development, and that some flagged requests would be routed to other models.
Anthropic said verified organisations could apply for biological research access through the Life Sciences Verification Program, and that the Cyber Verification Program would be extended to Opus 5.5 in the coming weeks. Frontier Design and METR tested the model before release, and Anthropic said it was available on Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure. Artificial Analysis said Opus 5.5 scored 58 on its Intelligence Index, led six of ten evaluations and tied GPT-6 Astra on Terminal-Bench 4.0.
Named in this story
Companies
- Anthropic
- launched Claude Opus 5.5 and made the performance and safety claims
- OpenAI
- a rival company in the benchmark comparisons
- Amazon Web Services
- a platform where the model was available
- Google Cloud
- a platform where the model was available
- Microsoft Azure
- a platform where the model was available
Organisations
- Artificial Analysis
- published independent benchmark results on the model
- Frontier Design
- tested Opus 5.5 before release
- METR
- tested Opus 5.5 before release
Governments and agencies
- EU AI Act
- the regulation Anthropic cited for watermarking compliance
Products and systems
- Claude Opus 5.5
- the model being launched
- Claude Fable 5.1
- the comparison model for performance and safeguards
- Claude Sonnet 5.5
- an upcoming model in the same family
- Claude Haiku 5.5
- an upcoming model in the same family
- Claude Opus 5
- the previous version used for cost comparisons
- GPT-6 Astra
- a rival model used in benchmark comparisons
- GPT-5.6 Sol
- a rival model used in benchmark comparisons
- FrontierCode
- a benchmark used in Anthropic's price and performance claims
- Terminal-Bench 4.0
- a benchmark used in Anthropic's and Artificial Analysis's comparisons
- Life Sciences Verification Program
- the route for verified organisations to apply for biological research access
- Cyber Verification Program
- the programme Anthropic planned to extend to Opus 5.5
How the source tells it
The piece read like a promotional launch write-up, with Anthropic's claims and benchmark wins carrying most of the weight.
- vendor boosterism Anthropic's own launch claims and benchmark wins were treated as the core evidence
- hype superlative ranking language and repeated first-generation framing cast the release as a leap
- security urgency distillation attacks and safety standards were framed through misuse risks and policy pressure