ARTIFICE DAILY AI + CYBER SECURITY BRIEFING

Artificial Intelligence

Altman and Amodei address UN Security Council on AI

The OpenAI and Anthropic chiefs used separate briefings at the United Nations security council to argue for human control, international rules and a slower pace in some AI development.

The Guardian

Sam Altman of OpenAI and Dario Amodei of Anthropic addressed the United Nations security council in separate sessions on Wednesday. The article said the two companies have faced closer scrutiny over the safety of their products.

Altman said AI could produce either creative progress or disruption, and he urged governments to shape its future through democratic institutions. He also said the most important decisions should not be left to labs in San Francisco alone.

He argued that AI systems should stay under human control, should help people in practical ways and should support individuals. The article said his remarks did not dwell on the worst-case warnings that have circulated this month.

Amodei spoke by video call and repeated points from a 12 September blog post that called for more global cooperation and oversight. He said AI could pose a threat to humanity if handled badly, and he backed bans on AI for biological weapons work and international standards for testing new models.

The article also linked Altman’s speech to OpenAI’s political activity, saying the company’s president Greg Brockman is associated with Leading the Future PAC. It said the committee had raised more than $100m and spent millions on candidates who support stronger regulation being defeated.

Named in this story

People

Sam Altman
OpenAI chief who addressed the council and argued for democratic oversight
Dario Amodei
Anthropic chief who addressed the council by video call
Greg Brockman
OpenAI president whose political action committee was mentioned
Elon Musk
one of the figures named as supporting a slowdown in AI development

Companies

OpenAI
Altman’s company and the subject of the lobbying reference
Anthropic
Amodei’s company and the source of the safety warnings cited
Google
one of the companies named as supporting a slowdown in AI development

Organisations

United Nations security council
the body that heard the briefings on AI safety
Leading the Future PAC
the committee said to have raised more than $100m and backed candidates

How the source tells it

The article is mostly straight reporting, but it leans on alarm and rivalry framing through repeated references to existential risk, political pressure and the companies’ competition.

  • alarm repeated references to warnings that the technology could wipe out humanity
  • urgency the issue is presented as needing slowdown and international cooperation
  • rivalry the firms are described as arch-rivals jockeying for the lead
  • vendor boosterism executives are allowed to tout AI’s productivity gains and public benefits