Artificial Intelligence
Meta and Microsoft cut internal use of Claude
The Information reported that Meta Platforms and Microsoft were reducing staff use of Anthropic’s Claude and moving workers towards their own tools, while Meta’s internal Claude Code usage fell and Microsoft’s budget estimate dropped.
- The Information reported that Meta Platforms and Microsoft were cutting employees’ internal use of Anthropic’s Claude and shifting staff to their own AI tools.
- The article said Microsoft had earlier expected to spend at least $1 billion on Anthropic’s technology, but that estimate was later reduced by more than a third.
- It said Microsoft leaders had asked employees to limit Claude use, while customer spending on Anthropic models through Microsoft’s enterprise platforms was still growing.
- The article said Meta’s use of Claude Code had fallen to about 30,000 employees from about 60,000 earlier in the year.
- It said Meta began external testing of Muse Code in August, with more than 6,000 internal users, and that MetaCode had passed 30,000 users.
The Information reported that Meta Platforms and Microsoft were cutting back on internal use of Anthropic’s Claude and directing workers to tools they developed themselves. The report was based on sources familiar with Microsoft’s budget and on figures about Meta’s internal usage.
It said Microsoft had once expected to spend at least $1 billion on Anthropic’s technology, but that estimate had since been reduced by more than a third. Company leaders had also asked staff to use Microsoft’s own AI products instead, according to the report.
The article added that this change concerned internal operations only, not customer demand. It said spending by customers on Anthropic models through Microsoft’s enterprise platforms was still increasing.
At Meta, use of Claude Code had reportedly dropped to about 30,000 employees from about 60,000 earlier in the year. The report said spring layoffs that affected about 10% of Meta’s 78,000-person workforce contributed to the fall, but that the main reason was Meta’s work on its own AI system.
It said Meta’s Muse Spark model line had replaced much of the need for Claude, and that the company had started outside testing of Muse Code in August. The article said Muse Code had more than 6,000 internal users, while MetaCode had more than 30,000.
Named in this story
Companies
- Meta Platforms
- reduced employees’ internal use of Claude and pushed its own AI tools
- Microsoft
- reduced employees’ internal use of Claude and steered staff to its own AI offerings
- Anthropic
- provided the Claude AI technology
Products and systems
- Claude
- Anthropic’s AI technology that both companies were using less internally
- Claude Code
- the coding assistant whose use fell at Meta
- Muse Spark
- Meta’s model line that the article said displaced some Claude use
- Muse Code
- Meta’s code tool that was in external testing
- MetaCode
- Meta’s internal code tool that had surpassed 30,000 users
How the source tells it
The piece was a straight business-news summary with light boosterish language around Meta’s own tools and a cost-cutting frame around Claude use.
- boosterism comparative praise for the companies’ own tools and models
- cost-cutting urgency loaded language about slashing projections and curbing usage