Artificial Intelligence · Cybersecurity
Anthropic expands Claude access and cites 129,000 flaws
Anthropic said it widened access for approved cyber teams under a new programme with three tiers, and said Project Glasswing and open-source scanning found 134,500 verified software vulnerabilities.
- Anthropic said on Tuesday that it was expanding its Cyber Verification Program for vetted cybersecurity professionals.
- The programme gave three access tiers and included Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Mythos 5.1.
- Anthropic said Project Glasswing found at least 129,000 verified software vulnerabilities between April and July 2026, plus another 5,500 between April and October 2026 from open-source scanning.
- Patrick Garrity of VulnCheck said only two of 300 vulnerabilities found by Anthropic or Project Glasswing had been exploited in the wild.
Anthropic said it had widened the Cyber Verification Program for approved security teams. The programme offered three access levels and included Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Mythos 5.1.
The company said the first tier covered defensive work such as incident response, malware analysis and vulnerability checking. The second added authorised penetration testing and red-teaming, while the third was limited to a small set of verified organisations that were allowed to test safety systems.
In testing reported by Anthropic, CyScenarioBench blocked 46 of 50 tasks on Claude Opus 5.5 in the defensive tier. On the same model, the red-team tier completed 34 of 50 tasks, and the article said all tasks were blocked before CVP access was used.
Anthropic said Project Glasswing found at least 129,000 verified software vulnerabilities from April to July 2026. It said open-source scanning found another 5,500 between April and October 2026, and that more than 33,000 of the verified flaws were rated critical or high; it also said that figure was probably low because it came from only some partners.
Patrick Garrity of VulnCheck said in a late-September analysis that only two of the 300 vulnerabilities found by Anthropic or Project Glasswing had been exploited in the wild. He identified those as CVE-2026-26980 in Ghost CMS and CVE-2026-61500 in Rejetto HTTP File Server, and the article also cited Veracode as saying 44% of AI code generation tasks introduced a risky vulnerability in tests.
Named in this story
People
- Patrick Garrity
- published the VulnCheck analysis cited in the article
Companies
- Anthropic
- expanded its cyber access programme and made the vulnerability claims
- VulnCheck
- was the security research firm behind the cited analysis
- Veracode
- provided data on AI code generation security tests
Products and systems
- Cyber Verification Program (CVP)
- was Anthropic’s updated access programme for vetted cyber teams
- Claude Opus 5.5
- was one of the models offered through the programme
- Claude Sonnet 5.5
- was one of the models offered through the programme
- Claude Mythos 5.1
- was one of the models offered through the programme
- Project Glasswing
- was Anthropic’s vulnerability-finding initiative
- CyScenarioBench
- was the evaluation used to test the safeguards
- Ghost CMS
- contained one of the vulnerabilities said to have been exploited
- Rejetto HTTP File Server
- contained one of the vulnerabilities said to have been exploited
How the source tells it
The piece was mostly straight reporting, with some vendor-positive framing and a self-generated estimate that stretched the scale of the findings.
- vendor boosterism the company’s confidence in broader safe use was carried through its own promotional framing
- threat inflation an estimate based on a subset was presented as implying a much larger true total