Cybersecurity
FBI says Integrity-linked hackers built email access portal
A joint advisory said hackers linked to Integrity Technology Group stole email from organisations across several regions, used scanning and password tools to break in, and ran a site that exposed stolen mail.
- The FBI and six other countries' agencies said hackers tied to Integrity Technology Group stole email from organisations in Southeast Asia and targeted government, law-enforcement, healthcare, IT, education and religious bodies elsewhere.
- The advisory said the activity had continued since at least mid-January 2021 and that the hackers ran a web application that gave third parties access to stolen email.
- It said the intruders used scanners, fake login pages, SoftEther, DC.exe, Curlc4.txt and office-cli to enter networks, keep access and collect mail.
- The advisory listed eight exploited flaws, said five had been newly added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue, and said Integrity Technology Group had rejected earlier U.S. accusations.
The FBI and agencies in six other countries issued a joint advisory about activity they linked to Integrity Technology Group, which they described as a China-based company with ties to Chinese government security agencies. The advisory said the same operators had taken email from government, law-enforcement, healthcare and religious organisations in Southeast Asia, and had also targeted bodies in Africa and North America.
The agencies said the operators had been active since at least mid-January 2021. They used open-source scanners, including Nmap, to probe websites and services, guessed Microsoft 365 and Exchange passwords, and in one case lured visitors through a fake login page that delivered malware.
The FBI said the group had also run a web application that let third parties reach stolen email content. For persistence and collection, the hackers used SoftEther, a DCSync-based tool called DC.exe, and mail-collection scripts built from Curlc4.txt and office-cli; some access to the stolen data was restricted to IP addresses in Xiamen, China.
The advisory said its findings came from evidence the FBI gathered across several investigations, and that five of the eight flaws it listed were newly added to the U.S. exploitation catalogue at the time of publication. Integrity Technology Group rejected earlier U.S. accusations in January 2025, and the U.S. Treasury and the UK later sanctioned it.
Named in this story
Companies
- Integrity Technology Group
- the Chinese company tied by the advisory to the hackers and later sanctioned
Organisations
- National Cyber Security Centre
- one of the agencies behind the advisory and said the hackers used AI tools
Governments and agencies
- FBI
- co-authored the joint advisory and recovered evidence during investigations
- U.S. Treasury
- sanctioned Integrity Technology Group in January 2025
- UK
- sanctioned Integrity Technology Group in December 2025
- CISA
- maintains the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue
Products and systems
- Raptor Train
- the botnet the FBI disrupted in September 2024
- Nmap
- an open-source scanner the hackers used in reconnaissance
- MicroScan
- a Python web application with more than 1,300 scanning scripts
- SoftEther
- the VPN program the hackers installed to keep access
- EBurst
- the Python tool used for password spraying
- Microsoft 365
- one of the account services the hackers targeted
- Exchange
- one of the mail services the hackers targeted and collected from
- DC.exe
- the tool used for DCSync-style credential copying
- Curlc4.txt
- the script used to collect and upload mail
- office-cli
- the tool used to revisit Microsoft 365 accounts and take mail
- Strapi
- one of the vulnerable products the hackers targeted
- Apache Struts
- one of the vulnerable products the hackers targeted
- ONLYOFFICE
- one of the vulnerable products the hackers targeted
- BIND
- the DNS server whose flaw was listed among the exploited bugs
How the source tells it
The piece was written as a straightforward technical advisory report, without distinct emotive framing.
No emotive framing was found in the original.