ARTIFICE DAILY AI + CYBER SECURITY BRIEFING

Cybersecurity

ANY.RUN identified Wazza phishkit targeting US, Europe and Australia

ANY.RUN said Wazza used layered routing and token checks to screen visitors before serving an Adobe-branded Device Code phishing page, and described the kit as aimed at banking, manufacturing and government organisations.

The Hacker News

ANY.RUN said it had identified Wazza, a phishing kit linked to activity against banking, manufacturing and government organisations in the US, Europe and Australia. The piece said the kit did not send every visitor straight to the lure.

Instead, it described a sequence of checks that decided whether a request would continue. The flow began on boegl-krysl.eu and moved through /api/wazza-config, beacon-surge-sync[...]workers.dev, /api/mint-token and check.boegl-krysl.eu.

Only traffic that passed those steps reached a page dressed with Adobe branding. The article said that page used the Device Code authentication flow, which aimed at account access rather than password harvesting.

The article then turned to ANY.RUN's own products, saying its Interactive Sandbox could open suspicious URLs in virtual machines and generate reports quickly. It also presented Threat Intelligence Lookup and Threat Intelligence Feeds as ways to turn one investigation into indicators that could be reused elsewhere.

Named in this story

Companies

ANY.RUN
said it identified Wazza and promoted its analysis tools
Adobe
the branding copied by the final phishing page

Products and systems

Wazza
the phishkit described in the campaign
Interactive Sandbox
the sandbox ANY.RUN said analysts could use to detonate suspicious URLs
Threat Intelligence Lookup
the lookup tool ANY.RUN said analysts could use to pivot from indicators
Threat Intelligence Feeds
the feed product ANY.RUN said streamed validated indicators

Places

US
one of the regions the campaign targeted
Europe
one of the regions the campaign targeted
Australia
one of the regions the campaign targeted

How the source tells it

The article read like vendor marketing, mixing threat framing with repeated claims about faster investigations and lower analyst load.

  • vendor boosterism repeated self-promotional claims about sandbox speed, threat feeds and reduced escalations
  • threat inflation describing the kit as more than a malicious URL and as a broader problem for MSSPs
  • urgency time-saving and scale claims framed the product as a response to immediate workflow pressure