ARTIFICE DAILY AI + CYBER SECURITY BRIEFING

Artificial Intelligence

OpenAI says GPT-6 improves on COBOL and Fortran

OpenAI said its latest models performed better on tests for COBOL, Fortran and Visual Basic, with GPT-6 variants outperforming GPT-5.6 models on two benchmarks the company built.

THE-DECODER

OpenAI said it had improved its models for low-resource languages including COBOL, Fortran and Visual Basic. It also repeated IBM’s estimate that COBOL powered more than 40 percent of online banking systems and 95 percent of ATM transactions.

The company built MultiLangBench to measure progress on code generation across languages. The benchmark asked models to build a SQLite-compatible database engine from scratch, and GPT-6 Astra reached an average pass rate of 87.4 percent across 20 languages at maximum reasoning effort.

OpenAI said GPT-5.6 Terra had reached about 38 percent on the same test. GPT-6 Luna scored 40.3 percent, slightly above GPT-5.6 Terra’s 37.9 percent, while costing less.

On a second benchmark, GPT-6.1 Sol translated COBOL into C++, Java, Kotlin, Python or Rust. It scored 86.6 percent at low reasoning effort and 97.9 percent with higher reasoning, against 5.4 percent for GPT-5.6 Sol at low effort.

Named in this story

Companies

OpenAI
said it had improved its latest models for low-resource languages
IBM
was cited for estimating COBOL’s use in banking and ATM systems

Products and systems

COBOL
was one of the low-resource languages OpenAI discussed
Fortran
was one of the low-resource languages OpenAI discussed
Visual Basic
was one of the low-resource languages OpenAI discussed
MultiLangBench
was the benchmark OpenAI built for cross-language coding tasks
GPT-6 Astra
scored 87.4 percent on MultiLangBench
GPT-5.6 Terra
was the earlier model compared with GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna
scored 40.3 percent on MultiLangBench at lower cost
GPT-6.1 Sol
scored 86.6 percent and 97.9 percent on the COBOL migration benchmark
GPT-5.6 Sol
was the earlier model compared with GPT-6.1 Sol

How the source tells it

The piece was mostly a neutral benchmark report, with a mild vendor-boosterish cast from OpenAI’s own comparison framing.

  • vendor boosterism the headline and benchmark results repeated OpenAI’s self-assessment of improvement