Artificial Intelligence
Proofpoint says AI is weakening email behaviour detection
Proofpoint said generative AI had made malicious email more fluent and variable, and argued that defenders need intent-based analysis after behaviour signals and templates became less reliable.
- Proofpoint said generative AI had made malicious email more fluent, more personalised and harder to spot through behaviour alone.
- The company cited a real-estate campaign in which one actor used more than 30 accounts and different wording for different properties before pushing recipients towards video meetings.
- The FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center reported more than 22,000 AI-related complaints in 2025, nearly $900 million in losses, and 24,768 business email compromise complaints with about $3.05 billion in losses.
- Proofpoint said it had announced its Nexus Intent-Based Detection Model in September as part of Agentic Collaboration Security.
- Proofpoint also gave a Threat Investigation Agent example in which a finance account takeover was contained in four minutes after about 100 phishing messages were sent to 42 internal recipients.
Proofpoint said at its Protect 2026 conference that generative AI had changed the shape of malicious email. It said older behaviour-based filters had depended on clumsy wording, reused templates and other repeating patterns, and that those signals were now much less useful.
It pointed to one campaign in which a single threat actor approached more than 30 agents at the same real-estate firm from different accounts. Each message referred to a different property, but the threads all ended with the same request to join a video meeting.
The company also cited a case in which a late-night enquiry led to a branded meeting invitation and an urgent attention claim. It said the link used a legitimate redirect, while a URL parameter passed the click on to another site.
Proofpoint said AI had also been used in disruptive campaigns, in phishing kits that could be presented in several guises, and in business email compromise messages built around quoted threads and invoices. It said defenders needed to focus on the sender’s aim rather than on whether a message looked unusual.
It said it had announced its Nexus Intent-Based Detection Model in September as part of Agentic Collaboration Security, and described a three-tier review system that escalated only a small share of mail to deeper analysis. It also said its Threat Investigation Agent could work across email, identity, messaging, browsers and supplier activity, and gave an example in which it contained a finance account takeover in four minutes.
Named in this story
Companies
- Proofpoint
- presented the examples and its intent-based detection approach
Governments and agencies
- FBI
- was the parent agency of the complaint centre cited in the report
- Internet Crime Complaint Center
- reported AI-related and business email compromise complaint totals and losses
Products and systems
- Nexus Intent-Based Detection Model
- was Proofpoint’s intent-detection model announced in September
- Agentic Collaboration Security
- was the Proofpoint system that includes the model
- Threat Investigation Agent
- was Proofpoint’s investigation tool for incidents
Places
- New York
- was one of the sign-in locations in the example case
- Dallas
- was another sign-in location in the example case
How the source tells it
The piece is a vendor-led technical brief that warns about changing phishing tactics while repeatedly steering the reader towards Proofpoint’s own products and methods.
- vendor boosterism the story keeps shifting from the threat to Proofpoint’s own model, system and investigation tool as the answer
- urgency it frames the shift as something defenders must adapt to quickly, with repeated machine-speed and now-or-never language