ARTIFICE DAILY AI + CYBER SECURITY BRIEFING

Artificial Intelligence

OpenAI launches GPT-6.1 Terra

OpenAI launched GPT-6.1 Terra, a model aimed at computer use, visual reasoning and coding, and said it was cheaper and faster than its earlier Terra and Sol models.

BleepingComputer

OpenAI said it had launched GPT-6.1 Terra, which it positioned as a model for computer use, visual reasoning, coding and routine office tasks. The company said it was intended as a faster and cheaper option for work such as form filling, video editing, reading technical drawings and repetitive desktop operations.

In a blog post, OpenAI said Terra’s API cost was half that of GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol. It gave the price as $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens.

OpenAI said Terra outscored GPT-5.6 Terra by 15 percentage points on Agents' Last Exam at medium reasoning effort. It also said the model was more than three times faster than GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol.

The company said its internal benchmark showed the error rate dropping from 53.6% for GPT-5.6 Terra to 16.7% for GPT-6.1 Terra at low reasoning effort. It said coding results also improved, with Terra scoring 50.3% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 at maximum reasoning effort, while recommending GPT-6.1 Sol or GPT-6 Astra for the hardest coding work.

Named in this story

Companies

OpenAI
launched GPT-6.1 Terra and made the performance claims

Products and systems

GPT-6.1 Terra
the new model OpenAI announced
GPT-5.6 Terra
the earlier model used as a comparison for price and scores
GPT-6.1 Sol
a model used in OpenAI’s pricing and speed comparisons
GPT-6 Astra
a model used in OpenAI’s pricing and speed comparisons
Agents' Last Exam
the benchmark where OpenAI reported a higher score for Terra
Terminal-Bench 4.0
the coding benchmark where OpenAI reported Terra’s score
ChatGPT Work
one of the places where Terra became available
Codex
one of the places where Terra became available

How the source tells it

The register was promotional and press-release like, with OpenAI’s own benchmark claims carrying the story.

  • vendor boosterism the piece repeats the company’s self-described performance gains and pricing advantages without independent challenge
  • hype the article stacks relative speed, cost and score comparisons to present the model as a major advance